If your store is on
Built from what ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity tell a stranger about you, and the pages they opened to say it. Evidence your own AI can’t see. Paste the prompt into Claude, or hand it to your dev team.
You have used your free prompt.
Chatting with Claude is not the same as Claude changing your real site. One live session and you’re doing it, on your own site, with confidence.
Get set upIf your store is on
If your store is on
If your site is on
Not sure yet? Talk first, free, 20 minutes.
Every session includes a month of Oomira. Oomira gathers the evidence on what would improve your site, then hands you the prompts to change it.
“I’d been talking to two CRO firms with hefty price tags. Now I feel confident I can move faster, spend less, and have more control over the outcome.”
I’ve already gotten so much done on this train ride. Thank you so much for having me. Such invaluable info. Needed the hand holding and now I’m like okay , i got this! Appreciate it ! Xx
That’s soooo amazing to hear!!!
“I already use Claude a lot in my business, and this was still one of the most valuable mornings I’ve spent on my store.”
“What previously felt like a complicated, time-consuming process can now be done in a fraction of the time, without needing to rely on developers for every update.”
“I feel like I am able to get ahead of my competition by applying the tools made available through the platform.”
“The carbon figures are specific (13.01 kg CO₂e avoided per m² compared with bovine leather), but I couldn't find a source or methodology for them.”
> Open https://www.myco-futures.com/ and go to the second screen, the "More Impact" block where "13.01 kg CO₂e avoided per m² vs bovine leather" and "1.68 kg CO₂e avoided per m² vs PU synthetic leather" sit with nothing beside them. Today ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity all read this block: ChatGPT quotes the 13.01 figure and notes independent environmental verification remains limited; Claude quotes both figures and says it could not find a source or methodology for them; Perplexity, after also reading the impact page's line that findings "should be understood as directional rather than definitive," concludes the environmental benefits are preliminary rather than fully proven. They read it this way because the homepage states two precise, decimal-point figures with no calculation, scope, author or date attached anywhere near them, while the only page that discusses method, the impact page, describes the work as preliminary lifecycle assessment and carbon impact modelling without tying either number to it. Add one line directly under the two figures, in the same More Impact block, that names what produced them so a reader is not left to guess: "13.01 kg CO₂e avoided per m² vs bovine leather, from [the calculation], by [who], [scope], [date]." Fill each bracket only with what the company can state and stand behind; if the figures come from the preliminary lifecycle assessment and carbon impact modelling described on the impact page, say so plainly and add a short line pointing to that page for the full method, but do not claim the assessment is final, audited or independently verified if it is not. Do not invent a lab name, a standard, or a completion date that isn't real. After the edit, fetch the homepage without JavaScript and confirm the sourcing line appears on the second screen immediately beside the two figures, not buried lower on the page.“It also gives sources for its carbon claims (2025 assessments by UBC and Oxia).”

Oomira pinpointed specific gaps in our website content and turned them into clear, actionable improvements.
Going from a flagged unsourced CO₂ claim to making a targeted change by adding the citation made the impact tangible.
AI saidTheir prices aren’t published.
The promptState your prices in the homepage FAQ.The homepage is the page the agents read to answer this buyer.
AI saidThe results are mostly self-reported.
The promptName a client and an advisor behind the averages.Beside the numbers the agents quoted, on the same page.
AI saidThe product may not be real.
The promptRename the product photos named “ChatGPT Image”.Agents get the file names with the page. You only see the photos.
The companies are not named.
I started as a Shopify theme developer. Later I founded Sheertex and grew it to $45M in annual sales, constantly changing the pages that shaped what people believed about us.
Today a buyer asks ChatGPT or Claude what to use. The agent reads your pages and other people’s, then hands back a recommendation. Nothing appears in your analytics.
And coding agents changed who can fix it. A marketer can now make the change themselves. Oomira is both halves: what to change, and the skill to change it.
Gather the evidence on what AI says about you and why. Get the prompts that fix it. Then ask again to see what moved. Every session includes your first month.
10 tests a month. A test is one question’s prompts, written when you press.
Every recheck reruns the evidence a prompt was written from.
Prices in USD. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity in every plan. Counts reset each month.
Oomira gives you the prompts. A session makes sure you can use them: live by video, on your own site, until you are changing it yourself by asking Claude. The two free courses are the background, for anyone who wants it first. Every session comes with your first 30 days of Oomira, so the prompts arrive as soon as you can use them.
No. If you or someone on your team already changes your site with Claude, or with any agent, get your first prompt free and start. A session is for when a prompt would land on a site you cannot change yet.
No. Each change is a prompt you paste into Claude Code, into your store’s own editor, or into a ticket for whoever edits your site. If you have never changed your own site that way, one session sets you up, and both courses are free.
Yes. Using Claude in a chat and having Claude Code change your real site are two different things, and the whole session is spent on the second one. Everything you already know about asking Claude carries over. Shawn Lerner of Balloonery, who uses Claude a lot in his business, called it one of the most valuable mornings he has spent on his store.
It depends on where your site lives. On Shopify, your store stays where it is and Claude Code for Shopify teaches you to change it with prompts. On Wix, Squarespace, WordPress or Webflow, or with a site you started in Claude Code that never went live, book Get off drag and drop: go self-hosted or headless: we set your site up with you so you change it by asking Claude, looking the same. For most sites that means your own GitHub and Vercel; on Wix it can also be Wix Headless, where Wix keeps your bookings, store and members behind new pages. Not sure? Book a free 20 minute call at /book?topic=call.
You work on your own site by video, and you leave having made a real change to it yourself. We tell you what to install first. One to one, Claude Code for Shopify is 90 minutes and Get off drag and drop: go self-hosted or headless is 120: you book, we email to set a time, and up to 5 people from your team can join on the same booking at no extra cost. The Shopify group class is 120 minutes on a set date, Friday, October 16, 11:30am to 1:30pm Eastern, one seat each.
Two short courses: how a website works, and how AI reads your site. They are free, need no account, and are written for people who have never looked under their site before.
No. You pay once for the session, and it includes your first 30 days of Oomira. When they end nothing renews and your card is not charged again, unless you choose a plan yourself. To keep the prompts coming, Pro is $99 a month for one company, and Teams $259 a month for the whole team. Everything you changed on your site stays yours either way.
It gathers the evidence on what AI says about your company and why, then hands you the prompts that change it. Oomira asks 4 agents (Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini) the questions a buyer, an investor, a new hire or a reporter would ask, cold, with live web search and nothing supplied by us. It traces every sentence to the page behind it, writes each change as a prompt you can paste into Claude, and asks the same question again once the change is live to show what moved.
Your own AI gives general advice. Each Oomira prompt answers a sentence an agent actually said about you, on the page it got it from. Oomira asks Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini cold, keeps every page and outside site each one opened, and aims each prompt at the exact sentences that hold a buyer back. Then it asks again and shows whether those sentences went away. Visibility tools tell you how often you show up. Oomira shows what a buyer was told, why, and whether your change moved it.
Three kinds, all kept so you can open them yourself. What the agents said: the full answers from Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, split into sentences, with every sentence that holds a buyer back marked. What they opened: every page each agent opened or cited, fetched and kept as the text a machine is served. And your site as a machine sees it, measured on your own pages. Each prompt names the sentences it is meant to remove and the page it changes.
Your own assistant holds your history, your earlier questions and often your own website already in the conversation, so it answers about a company it has been introduced to. Oomira asks four agents cold: a blank slate, nothing supplied by us, one live search each. That is the answer a stranger gets, and it comes back with every page each agent opened, so a claim can be traced to the page that caused it instead of argued with.
When there is new evidence, never on a clock. A new question, a re-ask after a change, or a check of your site brings something new to work from, and the prompts are written from it when you press for them.
As fast as the agents fetch the page again. On MycoFutures’ test, Claude cited the sources they added five minutes after the change went live. On Sol Kyst’s, a new homepage went live and, asked again the next day, all five doubts the agents had raised were gone. A claim that came from an outside site, or from something cached, moves when that source moves. That is why every change is followed by asking the same question again and comparing with the answers before.
Your first prompt is free and needs no account: we ask 4 agents one question about your company and write the prompt from what they say. A work email opens the full report and one free re-ask once your change is live. Pro is $99 a month for one company: 10 questions and 10 tests a month, 3 re-asks per question, each counted separately. 1 user. A question is put cold to all 4 agents. A test is one question’s prompts, written when you press for them. A re-ask asks the same question again after a change. Checks of your own site are not counted, and Beliefs are written from your third asked question. Teams is $259 a month: the same counts, for 5 users. Enterprise is by contract and adds the fact check, the claim analysis, follow-up questions, site checks across subdomains, and several brands or markets. Nothing is asked on a schedule unless you set a re-ask yourself, and a month’s counts do not carry over.